Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Detecting Fraudulent Pearls!

So this morning I ran across an article on Physorg.com about cultured pearls and determining origin. The article, titled "Fraud with Cultured Pearls Can Be Detected", immediately caught my eye. What sort of fraud, right?

Reading this article was a bit of a chore. I kept checking the Google translate button at the top of my browser to make sure this article was not in German. The topic of the article is a discovery made by two scientists at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz in Germany. They have discovered a way to differentiate sweet-water pearls from China and cultured pearls from Japan. By sweet-water, I am pretty sure they are referring to freshwater. And although they call Japan’s pearls “sweet-water” as well, the description of the pearls clearly indicates they are referring to akoya. Ground breaking, right?!

The scientists’ argument is that even experts cannot tell the difference between freshwater pearls from China and akoya pearls from Japan, which are worth up to ten times more (according to the article). This ground-breaking discovery would enable labs and pearls experts to accurately distinguish one type of pearl from another.

The method, called laser ablation ICP mass spectrometry, determines whether or not pearls contain vaterite. OK, that cinches it. They are definitely comparing akoya and Chinese freshwater pearls, not Japanese and Chinese freshwater pearls as Biwa and Kasumi pearls both contain vaterite, a calcium carbonate polymorph that is known to adversely affect luster in concentrations near a freshwater pearl’s surface.

I’m now considering sending a letter to the university requesting publication of my own discovery! I too have found a way to accurately distinguish Chinese freshwater pearls from Japanese akoya!

My method involves directing a stream of electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths of ~300 nm to ~1400 nm on a strand of akoya or freshwater pearls. Then I utilize a device that works on the principles of the Gestalt Laws of Perceptual Organization: Proximity, Similarity, Closure, Symmetry, Common fate and Continuity. I’ve found this method to be foolproof! I’ve never seen a strand of akoya or freshwater pearls that were not completely distinguishable from one another.

The greatest part of my method is that a lab is completely unnecessary. You can use any room in your office.

I call my method, “Just turn on the lights and look at the pearls, dumbass!

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Tell me more about how you do it! tell me more! give me more information! tell my sweetwatery dumbass how to do such a do!??

The Pearl Professor said...

Electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths of ~300 nm to ~1400 nm
=
Light Rays

Gestalt Laws of Perceptual Organization: Proximity, Similarity, Closure, Symmetry, Common fate and Continuity.
=
Laws of Vision

Richard W. Wise said...

Pearl Professor,

Great post! How about more about you? Your complete profile is a bit light in facts. Did I say light? Nonexistent yet you seem quite knowledgeable.

I too write a blog called GemWise (Gonzo journalism for gem and jewelry lovers) www.gemwiseblogspotcom.blogspot.com and I like your take on things.

Best,
Richard

Pecheur de Perles said...

That article is surprizing. I found the German version here, here and there but it's not helping in differentiating freshwater from the akoya.

The University page for Ursula Wehrmeister shows some interesting studies: "Vaterite in freshwater cultured pearls from China and Japan" (if the article refers to this publication, then it's clearly japanese freshwater), "Micro Raman spectroscopy of pigments contained in different calcium carbonate polymorphs from freshwater cultured pearls", "Identifying Japanese Freshwater Cultured Pearls From Lake Kasumiga", "Identifying Kasumigaura Pearls", "Japanische Süßwasserzuchtperlen aus dem Kasumigaura-See", etc.

http://www.biomin.uni-mainz.de/deutsch/ma_wehrmeister.html

I vote for poorly informed journalism.

The Pearl Professor said...

I remember reading the vaterite article in The Journal of Gemmology. I found it quite interesting. If I recall there was a difference in the amount of vaterite found in kasumigaura pearls and Chinese freshwater. It was always found in Chinese fresh, not only sometimes in the Japanese. Vaterite apparently is most often found near the center of a pearl, suggesting it is an early-stage, developmental component. But when found near the surface or in pits, it adversely affected the pearl's luster.

The Pearl Professor said...

Hi Richard,

Sure I know your blog. I read it all the time. Believe it or not, I have read your book too. It had an interesting snippet about "water" that you do not see very often.

Slraep said...

Why have you erased my comments, Mr. Pearl Professor??? Was it something I said about "water" being a Zeide Erskine fabrication? Nobody believed her, remember? When it all came out that she was a troll, EVERYONE DENIED ever believing her. So what's the problem?

I guess people finding out that an author consulted Zeide Erskine is bad for the book selling business. Is that it?

Slraep said...

HEY!! Who the heck wrote that previous comment? Some wiseguy/gal is posting under my monicker. Very funny....