Wednesday, February 18, 2009

The World Pearl Forum

An expert pearl panel discussing the economic outlook for the pearl sector.The World Pearl Forum in Dubai has just come to a close and the reports are already flowing in. The following report was posted by an attendee. AME Info also has posted a short recap of the first day.

“Well, it is over. It certainly was a lot of fanfare for two days of speeches and panel discussions.

The pearl tender was described as a success, but oddly, results were never publicly disclosed. There were numerous gem lots from Paspaley, Wan and Jewelmer, as well as a large number of natural pearls – some of the most extraordinary coming from Paspaley and Titan Gold Mining Company.

The speeches began on the first official day, February 17th. After a short introduction from Ahmed Bin Sulayem and Gaiti Rabbani, the invited speakers began.

The speakers were lined up – the industry heavyweights in front. Paspaley first, followed by Robert Wan, Noriyuki Morita (pres. of Mikimoto) and Jacques Branellec. The listed topics focused on branding and market influence, but the speakers took their own routes. Starting with Nicholas Paspaley, we were treated to a historical account of each company’s history and detailed explanations of why they are just so damn great whilst playing promotional videos and featuring close-ups of branded merchandise. To Branellec’s benefit, he did have the crowd chortling more than once. Poor Morita-san looked close to passing out during his oratory – that’s one timorous Japanese gentleman.

The second half of the day had a lot more meat in it. It kicked off with a brilliant account by Chis Figee of the state of the economy and how that affects the jewellery market and the pearl market as a whole. This was followed by a lackluster panel discussion on economic outlook with the aforementioned speakers.

Justin Hunter was up next. He gave a stellar rendition of the up and coming Fijian industry. This was followed by chairman Zhan of Grace, a bumbling Bill Reed who could not seem to work the PowerPoint, Jeremy Shepherd with a well-received speech on the Internet’s role in the industry and the growth in jewellery sales online, and Jorg Gellner discussing family business and branding.

Kenneth Scarrat followed with a speech on new GIA grading “standards” and the ultimate goal of a national standard. This was followed by a lively panel discussion between Paspaley, Scarrat, Shepherd and Gellner. A meager 20 minutes was allotted to this panel, likely the most interesting part of the forum so far – that was unfortunate.

The second day began with Sonny Sethi and was slated to follow with Rosario Autore, but like Cepek of Iridesse, he was a no show. It appears two speakers succumbed to the bungling economy and had more important issues to attend. Hedda Schupak spoke of promotion, yet seemed out of her element in the pearl discussion. David Bennet delivered an interesting history of natural pearls on auction and KC Bell read from a prepared speech without the benefit of inflection. A good account of the natural abalone never the less.

On day two, the highlight was once again a panel discussion. The Pearls94-esque discussion focused on the need for a single body to promote pearls and pearl jewellery around the world – a DeBeer’s approach. The discussion came to no conclusion but did leave the door open for further discussion. When the Chinese delegate was questioned regarding their interest in supporting such an effort, their response was one of surprise. Maybe it was a language issue, maybe it wasn’t. Their response seemed to be one of, “No, we compete with you. We are here because we respect the natural pearl and respect the other pearl producers of the world. But we still plan to kick your asses.”

The conference ended with a late lunch and continued networking among the delegates, clearly the primary reason for attending for most of the crowd.

Overall, there were some great speeches. Figee, Shepherd, Hunter, Rogers, Sethi and Bennett genuinely delivered. The networking was nothing less than fantastic, and we left with some hope during this difficult time. Was World Pearl Forum ‘09 worth the time and expense? That’s a tough call. This industry has a habit of dropping the ball after big pearl conferences.

Thursday, February 12, 2009

World Pearl Assured - Just a Wee Bit Gimmicky

A carbon neutral pearl company.This morning I found an interesting press release in my inbox. The title is what drew my attention, CarbonNeutral pearls available from World Pearl.

What the hell is a carbon-neutral pearl, right? Anyone who has seen the carnage some pearl farms cause (primarily in China) would have a difficult time claiming freshwater pearls are carbon neutral. It is a slow week in pearl news, so I read on.

The pearls this company sells are of a new collection touted as the world’s first carbon neutral pearls. And all them are World Pearl Assured. Huh?! Yeah, that got my attention. Apparently in order for pearls to be World Pearl Assured, they must be real (made by mollusks, ya know), and they must be carbon neutral, which according to the release means that the pearls are not dyed.

So what does carbon neutrality have to do with natural color? Coloring pearls is one of the only post-harvest treatments that is done with organic substances – organic dyes! The Web site connected to the release, JerseyPearl.com, does sell freshwater pearls. So they are not dyed, but they are bleached, and I’m sure a lot of other treatments have been done to them too.

Whatever, right? A gimmick. No big deal. But what is World Pearl Assured? Damn, that sounds official! With the help of Google I found the site. Digging in, I *believe* they are claiming carbon neutrality by supporting groups and organizations that offset the carbon footprint left by pearls. Digging a bit further, WPA is actually owned by Jersey Pearl. Big surprise there.

I certainly hope they are making some hefty donations if they really are trying to make up for China’s footprint. Last year in Hubei, it got so bad that the government had to step in to ban new pearl farm developments.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Paspaley Pearls and the CCC

Is the Paspaley Organization working to monopolize the South Sea pearl industry?I came across and interesting blog post this morning mentioning Paspaley. The blog does not necessarily deliberate pearls. It’s more about exposing the happenings at the Corruption and Crime Commission of Western Australia.

Paspaley has quite the tendency to make news over in Australia. There was the recent tax issue, and they are constantly sponsoring one event or another. But this report is interesting.

The blogger, or group of bloggers, are claiming that Brett McCallum, who is the current Executive Director of the Pearl Producers Association in Australia, is more or less a lobbyist for the Paspaley organization with the CCC.

The claim goes on to state that the restrictive policy of hatchery shell essentially gives control of production directly to the big players in such a way as to put a stranglehold on the small players. This is putting them out of business.

It is a provocative read. How much of it is indubitable, I have no idea. If it is true, there's no big surprise here.